Supreme Court Implements Two-Child Policy: No Government Jobs for Families with More than Two Children
Rajasthan introduced this policy several years ago, making individuals with more than two children ineligible for government employment. The rule was designed to encourage family planning and population control. Despite challenges, the Supreme Court dismissed the case and upheld the state’s authority to implement the rule.
The Court justified the rule, stating that it falls within the jurisdiction of the state government and is not unconstitutional. The bench concluded that the goal of promoting family planning aligns with constitutional principles and is not discriminatory. It emphasized that it is within the state’s prerogative to impose such rules for the benefit of society.
This ruling also echoes a previous decision where the Supreme Court upheld a similar provision in Rajasthan’s Panchayat Elections Rules, which disqualifies candidates with more than two children from running for office.
The case began when Ramji Lal Jat, a former soldier, was denied a constable position in Rajasthan Police in 2018 under Rule 24(4) of the Rajasthan Police Subordinate Service Rules of 1989, as he had more than two children. After his application was rejected, Jat challenged the decision in the Supreme Court, but the ruling was upheld.
Under Rajasthan’s Service Rules, anyone with more than two children, as of June 1, 2002, is considered ineligible for government employment. The Court made it clear that such rules are within the rights of the state government, and the judiciary cannot interfere with them.
This decision reinforces the state’s authority to create and enforce its own policies. It will have a significant impact on candidates aspiring for government jobs in Rajasthan, as the rule prioritizes family planning and responsible population management.
